SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 836

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench
Honble SHIV KUMAR SHARMA & SHASHI KANT SHARMA, JJ.
Manikyapuri Housing Coop. Society - Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Chaturvedi & Anr. - Respondents
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1001 of 2003
Decided On : October 15, 2003

Advocates Appeared:
R.S. Rathore, for Appellant

Headnote:Constitution of India, Art. 227 – Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court – It is confined only to see whether an inferior Court or tribunal has proceeded within its parameters and not to correct an error apparent on the face of record, much less an error of law. (Para 2)

       The supervisory jurisdiction conferred on the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution is confined only to see whether an inferior court or tribunal has proceeded within its parameters and not to correct an error apparent on the fact of record, much less of an error of law. In exercising the supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution, the High Court does not act as an appellate court or a tribunal. (Para 2)

Honble S.K. SHARMA, J.–The appellant in the instant appeal seeks to quash the order dated August 26, 2003 of the learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition submitted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court was dismissed.

(2). We have heard Mr. R.S. Rathore, learned counsel and scanned the material on record. There Judge Bench of the Honble Supreme Court in Sadhna Lodh vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another (1), indicated that the supervisory jurisdiction conferred on the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution is confined only to see whether an inferior court or tribunal has proceeded within its parameters and not to correct an error apparent on the fact of record, much less of an error of law. In exercising the supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution, the High Court does not act as an appellate court or a tribunal.

(3). After exercising the power under article 227 by the learned Single Judge we do not see any further scope of special appeal in the instant matter. The special appeal being devoid of merit stands dismissed summarily.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top