A.C.GOYAL
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Parvati Devi – Respondent
(2). The relevant facts in brief are that the plaintiff- respondents No. 1 to 3 filed a civil suit for arrears of rent and eviction on 2.12.1987 with the averments that the suit house known as `Sansar Villa situated at M.I. Road, Jaipur was let out by the original landlord D.N. Sen at monthly rent of Rs. 230/-. The tenancy commenced with effect from 1.1.1954. D.N. Sen expired in September, 1967. The defendants started paying rent to Raghuveer Sen son of D.N. Sen. The monthly rent was enhanced to Rs. 270/- w.e.f. 1.11.1962. Raghuveer Sen had filed a civil suit No. 101/80. During the pendency of that civil suit, monthly rent was paid at the rate of Rs. 500/-. Hence, the suit was got dismissed in default on 15.7.1983.
(3). Thereafter, the suit house was purchased by the plaintiffs in portions vide registered sale deeds dated 14.6.1982 and registered exchange deeds dated 28.7.1987 and thus, the plaintiffs became the landlords of the defenda
1. Pal Singh vs. Sunder Singh ((1989) 1 SCC 444)–Followed.
2. Ram Gopal vs. Sukhdev Raj Rudra ((2001) 9 SCC 201)
3. N. Kamalam (dead) and Another vs. Ayyasamy and Another ((2001) 7 SCC 503)
4. Joginder Pal vs. Naval Kishore Behal ((2002) 5 SCC 397)
5. Sheikh Noor and Another vs. Sheikh G.S. Ibrahim (dead) by LRs ((2003) 7 SCC 321)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.