SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 515

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Balraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Purohit, for Balraj Singh and Anr. Pankaj Gupta & S.P. Sharma, for Ajit Singh

Honble GARG, J.–Both revision petition as well as transfer application are being decided by this common order as in both of them, parties are same.

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 123/2004

(2). This revision petition has been filed by the petitioners (hereinafter referred to as the decree holders) against the judgment dated 16.1.2004 passed by the learned District Judge, Sri Ganganagar by which he allowed the appeal filed by the respondent Ajit Singh (hereinafter referred to as the obstructer to the decree in question) and set aside the order dated 14.10.2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge (SD), Sri Ganganagar and directed the learned Civil Judge (SD) to make enquiry under Order 21 Rules 97 to 106 CPC and decide the application filed by the obstructer under the provisions of Order 21 Rule 97 CPC in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties.

(3). It arises in the following circumstances:

The decree-holders are the legal and absolute owner of premises of shop No. 84, Gurudwara Road, Sri Ganganagar comprising an area of 21x45 sq. ft. and that shop was let out by the decree holders to M/s Usha International Ltd., a public limited company having its re















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top