Honble SINHA, J.–Both these appeals involving similar questions of fact that law were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

(2). The factual matrix of the matter, however, is being noticed from Civil Appeal No. 1851 of 2002.

(3). The Appellant is in appeal before us being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 3.5.2001 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No. 624 of 2000 whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the respondent herein, questioning an Award dated 13.8.1999 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Faridabad, was allowed.

(4). The basic fact of the matter is not much in dispute. The respondent herein allegedly worked with the Appellant herein from 5.8.1994 to 31.12.1994 as Tubewell Operator. He allegedly further worked from 1.1.1995 to 16.5.1995 at Sector 37, Old Zone II. His services were terminated on or about 17.5.1995 whereupon an industrial dispute was raised.

(5). The Government of Haryana made a reference before the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court I, vide Haryana Government Endst. No. 32410-15 dated 7.10.1995, in exercise of the pow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document