Honble BALIA, J.–Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2). This case has a chequered course of claim to rights to the land in question.

(3). The land in question as appears from the chronology of events recorded by the Board of Revenue in its judgment dt. April 24, 1985, while deciding the review application arising out of its judgment dt. 5.6.78, that the land in question was a khudkast land of Samandar Singh, who died on Miti Kartik Sudi 15 Samvat 1975 corresponding to Gregorian Calendar 1918. He left behind him no male issue, but was survived by a widowed mother and two widows Ugma Bai and Bhanwar Bai. By order No.21773 the then ruler of Mewar ordered to take the said Khud Kasht land under the management of the State on finding that the three female heirs of Samandar Singh viz the two widows and widowed mother are not able to look after the land. The yearly yield from the Hawala land was Rs.125/- per annum and same was ordered to be paid to two widows and the widowed mother of Samandar Singh. Thereafter, on Miti Posh Budhi 10 Samvat 1976, the then ruler of Mewar passed another order No.23756 to the effect that the income from the land in village Parlia should be appropriated to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document