Honble BALIA, J.–Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2). As the matter can be decided without preparation of paper- book and filing of initial charges and list of documents, therefore, the same are dispensed with and the matter is heard on merits at the request of learned counsel for the parties.

(3). The appellant/petitioner Abdul @ Abud, since deceased, was prosecuted in the Court of Munsif & Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Barmer under Sec. 3/6 of the Indian Pass-port Rules on 10.2.81 inter alia on the allegation that accused Abdul alongwith one other person was caught by the patrolling guard/Officers at the Pakistan check post because they were crossing the Indian Border and they were not having valid pass-ports. The accused has stated in his statement that infact he was going to meet his sister through the way which was passing near the Border and he was wrongly caught. However, this plea was not accepted and he was convicted for the aforesaid offence.

(4). After this order of conviction was passed, proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under Sec. 63(1)(viii) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act for recovery of possession of land from the petitioner/appellant. It was rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document