SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 2

M.L.JAIN
Banwari – Appellant
Versus
Madanmohan – Respondent


Advocates:
J.P. Mathur, Advocate, for Petitioners;
Ashok Agrawal, Advocate, for Non-petitioner No.1

tSu] lnL; & ;g fuxjkuh Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] vyoj }kjk izdj.k la[;k 26@2001 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 20-8-2002 ds fo:) jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 230 ds varxZr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 }kjk lgk;d dysDVj] eq.Mkoj ds U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; o fMdzh fnukad 10-11-2000 ds fo:) ,d vihy Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] vyoj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dhA bl vihy eseks ds lkFk lgk;d dysDVj ds fu.kZ; dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi gh layXu dh xbZ fMdzh dh izfr vFkok izekf.kr izfrfyfi layXu ugha dh xbZ FkhA ;g vihy fnukad 12-2-2001 dks Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ FkhA nkSjkus dk;Zokgh vihy fnukad 28-5-2002 dks jsLiksaMs.V }kjk ,d izkFkZuk i= jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh ds U;k;ky; esa bl vkk; dk izLrqr fd;k fd pwafd vihyk.V }kjk ipkZ fMdzh vihy eseks ds lkFk izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSg blfy, vihy =qfViw.kZ gksus ds dkj.k pyus ;ksX; ugha gS vr% bl vihy dks jsosU;w dksV~lZ ikVZ II dh /kkjk 30 ds varxZr [kkfjt fd;k tkosA bld ipkr~ fnukad 4-6-2002 dks fcuk fdlh izkFkZuk i= ds vihyk.V }kjk fMdzh dks izekf.kr izfrfyfi U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ rFkk fnuk

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top