ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K.THAKKER
Kailash Chand – Appellant
Versus
Shri Dharam Dass – Respondent
(2). The appellant herein is the owner of the a building being House No. 108, Anandele, Shimla (suit premises for short). He let the first floor of the suit premises to the respondent. The landlord filed an eviction petition against the tenant in respect of the first floor of the building in November, 1980. The petition was allowed by the Rent Controller by an order dated October 31, 1984. The tenant preferred an appeal and challenged the decree of eviction. On September 17, 1986, however, a compromise was arrived at between the parties. On the basis of the said compromise, the tenant agreed to vacate first floor in favour of the landlord and was inducted as tenant of the ground floor of the same building.
(3). According to the landlord, at the relevant t
4. Food Corporation of India vs. New India Assurance Company Limited (1994(3) SCC 324)
5. K. S. Sundararaju Chettiar vs. M. R. Ramachandra Naidu (1994(5) SCC 14)
7. Bhatia International vs. Bulk Trading S.A. and another (2004(4) SCC 105)
8. Rakesh Wadhawan & Ors. vs. Messrs Jagdamba Industrial Corporation & Ors. (2000(5)SCC 440)
9. Surajmal vs. Radheyshyam (1988 (3) SCC 18)
6. State of Punjab and Another vs. Khan Chand (1974 (2) SCR 768)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.