SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Raj) 1091

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, H.K.SEMA
Madurambigai Ammal – Appellant
Versus
D. Somasundaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. Krishnamoorthy, R. Nedumaran, R.N. Keshwani, Advocates

Honble BALAKRISHNAN, J.—The Order of the Court was as follows :

The defendants are the appellants before us. The respondent Nos. 1 to 7 filed a suit for delivery of possession of mortgaged property. The mortgage was executed on 30.11.1974. There were two subsequent mortgages one on 15.7.1975 and second on 18.12.1975. After due notice to the mortgagors, the 13th defendant of the suit brought the suit property on public auction after sufficient advertisements published in the newspapers and the auction was held on 31.8.1981. The plaintiffs in the suit was the highest bidder in the auction.

(2). They paid the entire amount and sought for execution of sale-deed of the mortgage. The present appellants filed suit for redemption on 1-10-1981. Originally, it was filed in the form of an application as an indigent person and later it was converted into suit. Based on the sale-deed suit for possession was filed by respondent Nos. 2 to 7 on 10.9.84. The present appellants contended that by virtue the suit filed on 1.10.81, the right of redemption survived and it was not effected by the sale held on 31.8.1981. This contention was rejected and suit for possession filed by respondent Nos. 2 to 7 wa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top