Honble TATIA, J.–The facts of the case are that the complainant Manga Ram submitted a criminal complaint under Sections 420, 465, 466, 467 and 468, I.P.C. read with Section 120-B, I.P.C. against the 11 persons alleging therein that the complainant and the accused Nos. 1 to 4, namely, Ramu, Chauthu, Sua and Chhotu were the co-sharers in agricultural land bearing Khasra No. 231/1, 432/1, 426, 381 and 189 situated in village Sunariya and Dalatpura. Since the complainant Mangla Ram was not keeping the good health, therefore, his all four brothers (accused) were cultivating the land. The complainant, in his complainant, stated that the accused No. 2 to 4 were not giving share in the crop also and they started quarreling with him. Not only this but the accused persons by forging thump impression of the complainant, sold the land by registered sale deed dated 14.7.1982. In the complaint, it is submitted that out of two accused, Jeevan and Kushla, one put his thump impression representing himself to be the complainant. The complaint was forwarded under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C. To the concerned police station, upon which Case No. 86/1982 was registered. After investigation, the challan was f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document