SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 703

S.K.KESHOTE, AJAY RASTOGI
Ajay Pram – Appellant
Versus
Abha Pram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S. Rathore, for Appellant husband Reasham Bhargava, for Respondent wife

Honble KESHOTE, J.–Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the entire material available on the record.

(2). This appeal under Section 36 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter shall be referred to as `the Act, 1869) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is directed against the order, dated 24.8.2004 of the learned Family Court No. 1, Jaipur. Under the impugned order the learned Family Court allowed the application filed by the respondent wife and directed to husband to pay to her Rs. 1000/- per month maintenance allowance; Rs. 1000/- for litigation expenses and Rs. 300/- for expenses towards her appearance in the court for each date to and fro Ajmer-Jaipur with one assistant.

(3). During the pendency of the appeal the parties have settled their dispute and agreed to get their marriage dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent; accordingly they filed a joint application under Section 10-A of the Act, 1869. The compromise entered into between the parties have been attested by the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) under the directions of the Court.

(4). Section 10-A of the Act, 1869 makes a provision for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. It pr








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top