SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 1340

H.R.PANWAR, N.K.JAIN
Pareshar Soni – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anand Purohit, for Appellant Kailash Joshi, for Respondents

Honble PANWAR, J.–By the instant Special Appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, the appellant- petitioner has sought the relief of setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 19.7.99 passed by the learned Single Judge in SBCWP No. 2159/1997 and allowing the writ petition as prayed therein.

(2). The facts, relevant and necessary for decision of the instant Special Appeal, in succinct, are that the appellant purchased an old house from one Smt. Shanti Kumari Lodha vide registered sale deed dated 15.5.87. The said property is situated at Moti Chowk, Jodhpur. Smt. Shanti Kumari acquired ownership and possession of the said property by a judgment and decree dated 6.6.72 passed by the Calcutta High Court in Civil Suit No. 867/1934. After purchase of said property, the appellant filed an application under Section 170 (1) of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 (for short, ``the Act hereinafter) before the respondent Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur seeking permission for raising construction of shops and residential house. Respondent did not respond the notice and, therefore, a notice under Section 170 (8) of the Act was served upon the respondents fixing a


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top