SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 1625

H.R.PANWAR
Laxman Ram Meghwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Suresh Kumbhat, for Petitioners O.P. Rathi, Public Prosecutor for State

Honble PANWAR, J.–This criminal revision petition u/s. 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ``the Code) is directed against the Order dated 5.4.2005 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Balotra (For Short, ``the Trial Court), whereby the Trial Court, on an application filed by the prosecution, arraigned the petitioners as accused and took cognizance against them and summoned them by non-bailable warrants. Aggrieved by the order impugned, the petitioners have filed the instant criminal revision petition.

(2). I have heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned order and the police challan papers as also the statements of as many as 12 prosecution witnesses which have been recorded till the date of passing of the impugned order.

(3). The facts giving rise to the instant revision petition are that on 11.7.2002, complainant PW-5 Uda Ram filed a complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, Siwana for the offences u/ss. 447, 323, 143 IPC and Sec. 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ``the Act hereinafter). The Judicial Magistrate, Siwana, forwarded the complaint t












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top