H.R.PANWAR
Laxman Ram Meghwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). I have heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the impugned order and the police challan papers as also the statements of as many as 12 prosecution witnesses which have been recorded till the date of passing of the impugned order.
(3). The facts giving rise to the instant revision petition are that on 11.7.2002, complainant PW-5 Uda Ram filed a complaint before the Judicial Magistrate, Siwana for the offences u/ss. 447, 323, 143 IPC and Sec. 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ``the Act hereinafter). The Judicial Magistrate, Siwana, forwarded the complaint t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.