R.P.VYAS
Lal Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). Brief facts, giving rise to the instant petition, are that on 1.8.1993, the petitioner entered in the service of the respondent-department, being surplus from the General Administration Department (GAD). In the year, 1986, the respondent-department published a seniority list of technical employees of Deedwana Division dated 31.3.1985 (Annexure 1), in which name of the petitioner was shown as Helper at Serial No. 5. Again, vide office order dated 22.6.2001 (Annexure 2), a provisional seniority list of regular employees was issued, in which also, the petitioner was shown as Helper. It was also mentioned in the aforesaid order that if any employee has any objection with regard to the said provisional seniority list (Annexure 1), he can send the representation along with the concerned service record within fifteen days. It is further averred by the petitioner that he was regular employee of the respondent-department (PHED) and was performing the duty of Helper, so he was given the pay scale of Rs. 2450-310. But, later on, the Department
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.