SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Naresh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
RPSC Ajmer – Respondent
(2). The petitioners in the instant writ petitions seek judicial review of the action of Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for short `RPSC), whereby the RPSC in exercise of powers under Rule 15 of the Rajasthan State & Subordinate Services (Direct Recruitment by Combined Competitive Examination) Rules, 1999 (for short `1999 Rules) invited the candidates for interview by including the candidates in the general category on the strength of their merit irrespective of their status being in the reserved or non reserved category.
(3). The grievance of the petitioners is that RPSC should have positioned placement in the general category only of the candidates who do no belong to the reserve category. In other words the stand of the petitioners is that at the stage of being invited for interview the placement in the general category is the exclusive privilege of the non reserved category and inclusion of reserved category candidates in such a list on account of t
Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India (AIR 1993 SC 477) 16
Tata Cellular vs. Union of India (AIR 1996 SC 11) 20
Ritesh R. Shah vs. Dr. Y.L. Yamul (1996 (3) SCC 253) 15
R.K. Sabharwal vs. State of Punjab (1995(2) SCC 745) 17
Inder Prakash Gupta vs. State of J & K (2004 (6) SCC 786) 22
Dharamveer Tholia vs. State of Raj. (2000 (3) WLC (Raj.) 399) = (RLW 2000(3) Raj. 1809) 21
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.