SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 852

S.K.KESHOTE, AJAY RASTOGI
Chand Mal Bairwa – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Tantia, for Petitioners

Honble KESHOTE, J.–In this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, five in number, are praying for grant of following relief.

``(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature thereof held that amended provisions of Rule 4 of amended Rules, 2002 limiting 3% reservation quota on horizontal basis is bad in law and ultra vires to the provisions of Section 33 of the Act of 1995 and it be further declared that the petitioners and similarly situated disabled candidates are entitled to get 3% quota in the same manner as other reservations being provided;

(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby quash the merit list prepared by RPSC and direct the respondents to again prepare the fresh merit list after considering the aforesaid roster for disabled candidates and also prepare a separate merit list for disabled candidates;

(iii) any other order or direction which the Honble Court deems fit and proper be also passed and cost be awarded.

(2). The petitioners have made the challenge to Rule 4 of the amended Rajasthan Disabled Persons Employment Rules as amended in 2002, on the ground that it is ultra vires of Section 33 of the Persons






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top