S.K.KESHOTE, AJAY RASTOGI
Chand Mal Bairwa – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
``(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature thereof held that amended provisions of Rule 4 of amended Rules, 2002 limiting 3% reservation quota on horizontal basis is bad in law and ultra vires to the provisions of Section 33 of the Act of 1995 and it be further declared that the petitioners and similarly situated disabled candidates are entitled to get 3% quota in the same manner as other reservations being provided;
(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby quash the merit list prepared by RPSC and direct the respondents to again prepare the fresh merit list after considering the aforesaid roster for disabled candidates and also prepare a separate merit list for disabled candidates;
(iii) any other order or direction which the Honble Court deems fit and proper be also passed and cost be awarded.
(2). The petitioners have made the challenge to Rule 4 of the amended Rajasthan Disabled Persons Employment Rules as amended in 2002, on the ground that it is ultra vires of Section 33 of the Persons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.