Back
[Citation : RLW 2005(1) RJ 203 (HC)]
(Rajasthan High Court)
HON'BLE N.N. MATHUR & K.K. ACHARYA, JJ.
Abdul Rahman
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1536 of 2003, decided on 02.08.2004
Writ petition disposed of.
``(3) Suggestions for restoring the catchment areas to their original shape and use:
Looking to the site visit by the State Level Expert Committee in September 2003 and General Survey Reports received from the District Collectors and Chairmen, District Expert Committee, following suggestions are made:
1. All land shown as drainage channels like nalla, rivers, tributaries etc. as on 15.8.19 All 147 should be declared as Govt. land. Any conversions made after 15.8.1947 should be declared illegal. The relevant act and rules must be amended accordingly.
2. Demarcation of catchment areas should be done by construction pillars at suitable spacing depending upon size of the catchment area with the help of GT sheet of scale 1:25000 or 1:50000 and/or ``Water Shed Atlas of Rajasthan prepared by the State Remote Sensing Application Centre, Jodhpur.
3. Demarcation of drainage channels-
(i) In unhabited areas this can be done by installing pillars at suitable spacing or by constructing side wall depending upon size of drainage channel and its importance.
(ii) In urban and rural areas, the demarcation of drainage channels must essentially be done by constructing side walls of appropriate height and thickness.
4. In the government owned lakes and other water bodies, the Khatedari rights of private persons in their submergence area should be brought under the ownership of the government.
5. The drainage channels in the catchment areas should be got inspected by engineering professionals and Patwaris. Wherever there are obstructions in nalla, it should be suitably removed by constructing culverts, deepening and widening of nallas etc.
6. Wherever there are any construction activities, which may interfere with the flow of water in drainage channels, no objection certificate must be obtained from the irrigation department.
7. The Anicuts more than 2m height above deepest nalla bed should be identified. The height more than 2m should be dismantled.
8. Wherever residential colonies have been constructed obstructing flow in drainage channels, the obstruction must be removed and nallas may be deepened/constructed.
9. On the periphery of lakes, ponds, water bodies in urban and rural areas, a pucca drain should be constructed on periphery of the water body to prevent entry of domestic, industrial and other waste in the water body.
10. For soil conservation work, suitable guidelines must be issued by the ``Watershed & Soil Conservation Department so that these works make minimum possible interference with the flow of water.
11. The district administration should specify places for dumping various types of waste material. If any body is found to dump the waste material in other places, particularly drainage channels, then suitable punishment should be provided in the law.
12. The government should use television, radio and newspapers to create awareness in this matter.
13. Possibility should be explored to use marble slurry as construction material, for filling depressions etc. as has been done for disposal of fly ash from Thermal Power Houses.
14. The water quality of water bodies should regularly be monitored.
15. Wherever over-burden or waste materials generated from mines and processing units, have been dumped obstructing flow of water in drainage channels; diversion drains and check walls must be constructed. For that purpose, special condition should be incorporated in the lease/license agreement (Para 15)
.
(2). Referring to the provisions of Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956, it is submitted that no Nadi land can be used for any sort of construction.
(3). The backdrop in which the petition has been filed, needs to be noticed. There is a gair mumkin Nadi measuring 9 bighas 17 biswas in Khasra No. 253 at Village Marwar Balia and so also, there is a land measuring 29 bighas 1 biswa in Khasra No. 266 and this land is gair mumkin pasture land. The land situated in Khasra No. 253 being a gair mumkin Nadi, cannot be used for construction of any sort of building. However, the third respondent viz. Mohd. Yusuf, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Marwar Balia has started construction of a school building in the land situated in Khasra No. 253. It is further stated that some persons made encroachments in the said gair mumkin Nadi land of Khasra No. 253 and those persons served with notice for removing encroachments and thereafter all the encroachments were removed. A direction is sought restraining the respondents to construct the school building in Khasra No. 253, which is a Nadi land.
(4). In reply to the writ petition, it has been admitted that in the revenue record, Khasra No. 253 is recorded as gair mumkin Nadi land and Khasra No. 266 as gochar land. However, it is denied that there is any Nadi land over the disputed site. There is 29 bighas as one biswa of land as straight land. There exists various buildings viz; ``Aanganbadi, Sub Health Centre, G.L.R. Building etc. It is further stated that large number of residential houses have been built therein. Thus, a proposal has been sent for conversion of the land as ``Abadi land. So far as the construction of the school is concerned, it is submitted that the same is in the larger public interest. In the same area, number of Government buildings have already been constructed.
(5). It appears that there has been indiscriminate utilization of the catchment areas for construction and mining purposes which has prevented lakes, reservoirs, rivers, ponds etc. from receiving water even during the rainy season. This Court by order dated 18.7.2003 directed the State Government to undertake a general survey to identify the catchment area which have been used for construction and mining purposes. It was further directed that survey shall also be undertaken for the purpose of studying the effect of utilization of catchment areas for construction and mining purposes or for other purposes. Further, suggestion was sought for restoring the catchment areas to their original shape and use.
(6). Pursuant to the directions of this Court dated 18.7.2003, the State Government constituted an Expert Committee with the following compositions:
1. Shri Y.C. Agrawal, Director (MIS), ID & R,
Irrigation Department, Sinchai Bhawan, JLN
Marg, Jaipur. Convener
2. Sh. S.B.L. Mathur, Jt. Director, Jodhpur
Range, Watershed Development & Soil-
Conservation Department, Jodhpur. Member
3. Sh. S.S. Dhindsa, Chief Chemist,
PHED, Jaipur. Member
4. Sh. Rakesh Hirat, Superintending Mining
Engineer, Udaipur. Member
(7). The said Expert Committee has conducted the survey and submitted its report to this Court. It appears that the Committee inspected various lakes in Udaipur, Rajsamand and Ajmer. It also met the Government Officials and Non-government persons related to the subject. The Committee also inspected the mining areas to collect the relevant information. General Survey Reports were sought from the District Collectors and Chairman, District Expert Committee from all districts. District wise abstracts of obstructions in catchment areas of reservoirs/ponds/lakes etc. and obstructions to be removed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
