SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 2849

DINESH MAHESHWARI
Amolak Singh Gulab Singh – Appellant
Versus
Civil Judge – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G. J. Gupta, for Petitioner Vinod Bhadu, for Respondent No.2

Honble MAHESHWARI, J.–These four writ petitions, although relate to different Civil Original Suits, involve a common short point and have been submitted against the similar nature order dated 8.8.2005 passed in all the four suits, hence were heard together and are taken up for final disposal by this common order.

(2). The petitioner M/s. Amolak Singh Gulab Singh is the defendant in four Civil Original Suits filed against it by different plaintiffs for recovery of different amount which are pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sri Ganganagar. For clarification, the particulars of these four suits, their valuation and the names of the plaintiffs (who are respondent No.2 in the respective writ petition) could be usefully referred as under:-

Writ Petition No. C.O. Suit No. Name of Plaintiff Valuation of Suit

6033/2005 20/2004 Manjeet Singh Rs. 36,231.15

6079/2005 34/2004 Jagsir Singh Rs. 40,040.00

6081/2005 35/2004 Bhag Singh Rs. 30,079.90

6082/2005 22/2004 Gurpreet Singh Rs. 26,844.00

(3). It appears that in Civil Original suit Nos. 34/2004 and 35/2004 that the petitioner was served with the summons of 22.2.2005, whereas in Civil Original Suit Nos. 20/2004 and 22/2004 it wa
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top