RAJESH BALIA, R.P.VYAS
Moola Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). The facts of the case are that the appellant, who has to his credit the degree of B.A., which he qualified in the year 1994 and also holds the degree of Bachelor of Physical Education (B.P.Ed.) since 1996 and was eligible to hold the post of Physical Education Teacher Gr.III, encadered under the Rajasthan Educational Subordinate Service Rules, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as `the Rules of 1971).
(3). An advertisement of appointments to the posts of Teacher Gr.III in different disciplines including Teachers in Physical Education Gr.III to fill up the vacancies for 1997-1998 was issued by the District Education Officer (Boys), Barmer. For belonged to General Category and rest to the Reserved Categories. The appellant-petitioner, in pursuance thereof, applied for the post.
(4). In pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement, after the selection process was over, a select list was prepared in the order of merit on 20.6.1997 and was forwarded to the concerned authority in which name of appellant-petitioner was empanelled at s
Shanker Das Sen vs. Union of India (AIR 1991 SC 1612) 20
Virendra S. Hooda & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Anr. (1999(3) SCC 696) 20
Bihar State Electricity Board vs. Suresh Prasad & Ors. (2004(2) SCC 681) 24
Brijendra Singh & Ors. vs. State & Ors. (2005(3) RDD 397) 11
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.