GOVIND MATHUR
Ugam Raj – Appellant
Versus
Civil Judge (SD), Sojat City – Respondent
(2). The plaintiffs respondent No. 2 and 3 preferred a suit in the year 1990 before the competent civil Court seeking decree against the petitioner defendant for eviction from premises rented and for recovery of rent. After filing of written statement by the petitioner defendant the Court adjudicating the suit framed 12 issues. Three additional issues numbered as 11-A, 11-B and 11-C were framed by the Court below as a consequence of acceptance of an application preferred by the petitioner defendant under Rule 17 Order 6 CPC for making amendment in the written statement. The additional issues so framed read as under:–
^^¼11,½ vk;k dkuwuu uksfVl ds vHkko esa nkok [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gS\ ¼11-ch½ vk;k oknh }kjk nkSjkus okn U;k;ky; }kjk fu/kkZfjr fdjk;k izkIr dj ysus l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.