Honble PANWAR, J.–This criminal revision petition under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short, ``the Act hereinafter) is directed against the order dated 7.10.2005 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jodhpur (for short, ``the Appellate Court hereinafter), whereby the appeal filed by the delinquent juvenile through his father under Section 52 of the Act against the order dated 1.10.2005 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Jodhpur on an application under Section 12 of the Act declining to release the juvenile delinquent on bail, was dismissed. Aggrieved by the orders impugned, the juvenile delinquent has filed the instant criminal revision petition.

(2). I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the orders impugned passed by the Courts below.

(3). The petitioner has been declared juvenile by the Juvenile Justice Board and is facing trial for the offence under Section 376, IPC in a case arising out of the FIR No. 38/2005, Police Station, Jamba, district Jodhpur. The petitioner was arrested in the aforesaid crime report on 24.8.2005 and since then he is in judicial custody. The juvenile delinquent moved an application under Section 12 of the Act seeking bail, which came to be dismissed on the ground that the juvenile delinquent is an accused of a case of rape and is having the rural back-ground and, therefore, he is likely to expose the moral, physical and psychological danger. Against the order of the Juvenile Justice Board, the juvenile delinquent filed an appeal which came to be dismissed by the Appellate Court on the ground of gravity of gravity of the offence of rape.

(4). Learned Counsel for the juvenile delinquent submits that normally the juvenile delinquent should be released on bail unless there is some evidence that his release would defeat the ends of justice, or is likely to bring him in the association with some known criminal. Learned Public Prosecutor supports the orders impugned and submits that the offence of rape is heinous and, therefore, the Courts below rightly declined to release him on bail.

(5). I have given my thoughtful consideration to the rival submissions made by the learned Counsel for the parties.

Sub-clause (k) of Section 2 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short, ``the Act) defines ``juvenile or ``child, which reads as under:–

``Section 2 (k) ``Juvenile or ``child means a person who has not completed eighteenth year of age.

Section 12 of the Act reads as under:–

``Section 12. Bail to Juvenile.–(1) When any person accused of a bailable or non-bailable offence, and apparently a juvenile, is arrested or detained or appears or is brought before a Board, such person shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law for the time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety but he shall not be so released if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice.

(2) When such person having been arrested is not released on bail under Sub-section (1) by the officer-in-charge of the police station, such officer shall cause him to be kept only in an observation home in the prescribed manner until he can be brought before a Board.

(3) When such person is not released on bail under Sub- section (1) by the Board it shall, instead of committing him to prison, make an order sending him to an observation home or a place of safety for such period during the pendency of the inquiry regarding him as may be specified in the order.

(6). From the perusal of Section 12 of the Act, it is clear that a delinquent juvenile ordinarily has to be released on bail irrespective of nature of nature of offence alleged to have been committed by him

Click Here to Read the rest of this document