SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 2813

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench
Honble SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, J.
Kailash Giri - Appellant
Versus
Akhey Giri through LRs. & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 133 of 1981
Decided On : December 08, 2005

Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Agrawal, for Appellant S. Kasliwal with K. Verma, for Respondents

Headnote:C.P.C., Sec. 100 – Deciding appeal without deciding the issues framed by trial Court – Suits for partition – Trial Court framed 23 issues – Appellate Court did not choose to decide all the issues framed by the trial Court but itself formulated 5 new issues – Held – Appellate Court is duty bound to give adequate and satisfactory judgment with reasons as required by law – It cannot refuse to decide a point on which issue has been framed and evidence has been given by the parties – In not deciding all the issues appellate Court committed error of law – Matter remitted for fresh decision on all issues. (Paras 7 to 10)

       

Honble SHARMA, J.–In these two appeals since identical findings arrived at by the learned Additional District Judge No. 6 Jaipur City vide decrees dated January 2, 1981 in Civil Regular first appeals No. 102/80 and 103/80, are under challenge, I propose to decide them by a common order.

(2). Contextual facts depict that Akhey Giri filed suit No. (108/55) on May 27, 1955 against Pratap Giri and Tara Giri for partition claiming 1/3 share in the suit property. After about two years i.e. on March 23, 1957 Tara Giri, the uncle of Akhey Giri, filed another suit (50/1957) against Pratap Giri and Akhey Giri seeking partition and possession of the suit property. Both the suits were consolidated. Learned Additional Civil Judge No.2, Jaipur City on the basis of pleadings of the parties framed issues, examined witnesses and passed preliminary decree dated June 5, 1971 holding that Akhey Giri and Tara Giri each were entitled to 1/3 share in the suit property shown in the site plan 2 Ka. Suit Property 2 Kha was declared as joint property, whereas suit in regard to suit property 2 Ga, Gha and 5 was dismissed.

(3). Against the said decree Akhey Giri and Prahlad Giri S/o Tara Giri filed first appeals bearing Nos. 102/80 and 103/80. Learned Additional District Judge No. 6, Jaipur City although decided the appeals by two independent decrees but the date of decrees and conclusion was common. It was held that the plaintiffs were entitled to seek partition only of the properties mentioned in para `Ga, `Gha and `Na in the judgment. Against these decrees dated January 2, 1981 of the learned first appellate court that the instant appeals have been filed by the defendant Kailash Giri.

(4). I have heard learned counsel for the parties and scrutinised the record.

(5). In suit No. 108/55 instituted by Akhey Giri, learned trial court formulated as many as 7 issues as under:-

1- D;k tk;nkn eqUntsZ uEcj 2 ¼d½ ¼[k½ ¼x½ ¼?k½ o ¼M½ eks:lh gS vkSj dkfcys rdklek gSA

2- vk;k eqíbZ ,d frgkbZ fgLlk ikus dk gdnkj gSA

3- D;k edku eqrftdjk en uEcj 2¼d½ ekfQd vthZnkos ds pkSd eqrjdk ds mRrjh Hkkx esa izfroknh uEcj 1 us fcyk brgdkd rkehjkr djk jgk gS vkSj mldk nkos ij D;k vlj gSA

4- D;k ekfy;r xyr dk;e dh xbZ vkSj dksVZ Qhl ,Mosyksje isk djuh pkfg;sA

5- D;k nkok vUnj fe;kn ugha gSA

6- D;k vkjkth Hkksx o efUnj vfr;k jkt gS o ukdkfcys rdklek gSA

7- vk;k vkjkth eqUntkZ en uEcj 2¼6½ dkr dh gS blfy, bldk nkok vnkyr gktk ds lekvr ds dkfcy ugha gSA

In Suit No. 50/1957 filed by Tara Giri following 16 issues were framed:-

1- vk;k tk;nkn eqUntkZ en uEcj 2 vthZnkok eks:lh gS vkSj dkfcys rdklek gSA

2- vk;k edku iq[rk eqUntkZ en uEcj 2¼d½ vthZnkok iSf=d lEifr ugha gS blfy, ukdkfcys rdklek gSA

3- vk;k edku iq[rk eqUntkZ uEcj 2¼d½ vthZnkok ds fuLQ fgLls ij eqnnk;yk uEcj 1 dk xqftrk 25 lky ls dCtk gS] blfy, bl fgLls dh ckcr nkok ukdkfcy isk jQr gSA

4 vk;k edku eqUntkZ en uEcj 2¼d½ vthZnkok ij eqnk;yk uEcj -1 dk dCtk eq[kkfyQkuk f[kykQ mnsiqjh o uFkiqjh vkSykn HkHkwriqjh gS blfy, eqíbZ dks nk;jh nkok dk gd ugha gSA

5- vk;k vgkrk eqUnth uEcj 2¼[k½ vthZnkok iSf=d lEifr gksrs gq, Hkh dsoy N=h o lek/kh ds dke vkrh gS blfy, ukdkfcy rdklek gSA

6- vk;k efUnj rstsoj th egknso okds tksgjh dk jsrk o mlds lkFk ds edkukr nsoLFkku gS vkSj Bkdqj th dh lEifr gS blfy, ukdkfcy rdklek gSA

7- vk;k tehu eqykfotk efUnj eqUntkZ uEcj 2¼?k½ vthZnkok vfr;kjkt gS o Hkksx ds fy, gS blfy, ukdkfcys rdklek gSA

8- vk;k 6 III-II eq- okLrs Hksx feyrs gS blfy, ukdkfcy rdklek gSA

9- vk;k eqíbZ dk dCtk edkukr ij eqík;yk uEcj 1 dh dUlsUV ls gS blfy, dksVZ Qhl ,Mosyksje nsuk pkfg;sA

10- vk;k nhxj vkSykn HkHkwriqjh nkos gktk esa Qjhd t:jh gS] blfy, nkos esa uqDl vne bLrseky Qjhd t:jh [kkfjt gSA

11- vk;k vkjkth eqUntkZ uEcj 2¼?k½ vthZnkok dkLr dh gS] blfy, budk nkok vnkyr gktk ds lekvr ds dkfcy ugha gSA

12- vk;k tk;nkn eqUntkZ en uEcj 2 vthZnkok esa oknh 1@3 fgLlk ikus dk gdnkj gSA

13- vk;k edku eqrftdjk en uEcj 2¼d½ ekfQd vthZnkos ds pkSd eqrdkZ ds mRrjh Hkkx esa izfroknh uEcj 1 us fcyk bLrgdkd rkehjkr djk jgk gS vkSj bldk nkos ij D;k vlj gSA

14- vk;k























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top