KHEM CHAND SHARMA, SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Kishna – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). As per the facts stated in Writ Petition No.3480/2004, as many as thirteen members of petitioners family, including Jagan Nath, the son of the petitioner were convicted and sentenced. They subsequently were transferred to Sampurna Nand Open Air Camp Sanganer, Jaipur, Jagan Nath, the son of the petitioner, is willing to take the responsibility of the petitioner. An affidavit has been filed by Jagan Nath in the form of undertaking. Similarly in Writ Petition No.3481/2004 petitioners son Jagdish and in Writ Petition 3482/2004 petitioners son Ram Dayal have filed affidavits to the same effect.
(3). In the returns to writ petitions, the respondents averred that in view of the Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972 (for short, `1972 Rules), the petitioners are not eligible to be transferred to Open Air Camp. Since, the petitioners are infirm persons and incapable of doing daily work in order to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.