SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 504

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench
Honble SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, J. Honble R.S. CHAUHAN, J.
Chhitanya & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
D.B. Criminal Appeal No.1617 of 2002
Decided On : February 20, 2006

Advocates Appeared:
D.G. Chaturvedi, for Appellants R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor, for State N.A. Naqvi, for Complainant

Headnote:Penal Code, Sec. 302, 147, 148, 323, 341, 302/149, 307/149 – Right to private defence – Death of a woman – Cross cases filed – Non-explanation of injuries sustained by accused – Delay of 17 hours in lodging F.I.R. – Suppression of genesis and origin of occurrence – Held – No allegations for committing house trespass or criminal tresspass levelled against complainant party – It was a case of free fight – Injuries sustained to appellant were not caused by the deceased – Right to private defence was available to the appellants but Appellant `A far exceeded it by causing gunshot on vital parts of the body of deceased – He is guilty u/S. 304 Part I IPC – Rest were acquitted. (Paras 20 to 23)

       

Honble SHARMA, J.–Four appellants, along with co-accused Prakashi who died during trial, were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Bharatpur in Sessions Case No.195/2001. Learned Judge vide judgment dated November 23, 2002 convicted and sentenced the appellants as under:-

Atar Singh:

U/S.302 IPC :

To suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/- in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months.

U/S. 307 IPC :

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of Rs.500/- in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months.

U/S. 147 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

U/S. 148 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

U/S. 323 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.

U/S. 341 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month.

Jal Singh:

U/S. 302/149 IPC.

To suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/- in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months.

U/S. 307 IPC :

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of Rs.500/- in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months.

U/S. 147 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

U/S. 148 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

U/S. 323 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.

U/S. 341 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month.

Chhitariya and Mahaveer :

U/S. 302/149 IPC.

Each to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.500/- in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months.

U/S. 307/149 IPC :

Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine of Rs.500/- in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for two months.

U/S. 147 IPC:

Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

U/S. 323 IPC:

Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.

U/S. 341 IPC:

To suffer simple imprisonment for one month.

The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

(2). As per the prosecution story on April 19, 1997 at 1.30 PM the informant Nivori (PW-2) submitted a written report (Ex.P/1) at Police Station Roopwas stating therein that in the preceding night around 8-9 PM while Banwari, his wife Angoori (now deceased), Ranjeet and Bhagwan Dei were coming to the filed they were belaboured by Chhitariya, Atar Singh, Jal Singh and Prakashi on the road. On being exhorted by Prakashi to kill the enemies, Atar Singh opened fire with katta, pellets of which hit the neck of Angoori, who died on the spot. fire opened by Jal Singh hit the left shoulder of Ranjeet. Atar Singhs second fire hit he right hand of Banwari, who also sustained lathi blow inflicted by Mahaveer on his head. Hearing hue and cry when the informant, Kalua, Bhagwan Singh, Mst. Kallo, Udai Singh and mst. Kaila intervened, they were also beaten up. On that report case under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 307 and 341 IPC was registered and investigation commenced and on completion of investigation charge-sheet was filed. In due course the case came up for trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Bharatpur. Charges under Sections 147, 148, 323, 341, 307, 307/149, 302 and 302/149 IPC were framed against the appellants, who denied the charge and claimed trial. The prosecution in support of its case examined as many as 24 witnesses. In the explanation under Section 313 Cr.P.C., the appellants claimed innocence. No witness was however examined in defence. Learned trial Judge on hearing final submissions convicted and sentenced the appellants as indicated herein above.

(3). We have given our anxious consideration to he rival submissions and with the assistance of the learned counsel we have gone through the evidence on record.

(4). As per post-mortem report (Ex.P-36) deceased Angoori received following ante-mortem injuries:

There are multiple punctured lacerated wounds of size 3cm to .25cm on chest wall of both sides chest x 3cm to 2cm anteriorly going through inter costal space penetrating into the lung parenchyma both si





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top