SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 246

Rajasthan High Court
Honble R.P. VYAS, J.
Anda - Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Jail Appeal No.331 of 2002
Decided On : January 27, 2006

Advocates Appeared:
M.S. Rathore, for Appellant V.R. Mehta, P.P., for State of Rajasthan

Headnote:Penal Code, Sec. 366, 376, 342, 323, 324 – Abduction and commission of rape – Delay of two days in filing FIR – Discrepancies – Requirement of corroboration – Held – Delay in lodging FIR would not be fatal to prosecution case, if delay is properly explained – Minor discrepancies in evidence would not hurt prosecution case contrary they guarantee that witnesses are not tutored – The testimony of prosecutrix is vital, unless there are compelling reasons which necessitate looking for corroboration of her statement, the Courts should find no difficulty to act on her testimony to convict accused where it inspire confidence and is found to be reliable. (Paras 23 to 28)

       

Honble VYAS, J.–This appeal is directed against the judgment dated February 27, 2002, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No.3, Udaipur, by which accused - Anda has been convicted and sentenced under Section 366 IPC, to two years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.200/-, in default of payment of fine to further suffer fifteen days additional simple imprisonment; under Section 376 IPC, 5 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/-, in default of payment of fine to further suffer one months additional simple imprisonment; under Section 342, IPC 6 months rigorous imprisonment; under Section 323, IPC, 6 months R.I. and under Section 324 IPC, one years rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

(2). Briefly stated, the prosecution story is that on May 17, 2001 at 8.30 p.m., Kum. Dhani D/o Bhika by caste Garasia, R/o Parla-ka-Chaura, District Udaipur lodged a report (Ex.P/1) with the Police Station, Ogna, District - Udaipur that on May 15, 2001, at about 1.00 p.m. while she was going to her house, for taking lunch, after carrying out the work in Drought Relief Operation, then near Mahura, Anda S/o Gala Garasia, R/o Padmavri and Bhagga S/o Dhana Garasia R/o. parla Chaura, stopped her in the way and Anda, by using force and pulling her hand and dragging her, started to say that he would keep her as wife at his house. It was further averred in the complaint that while she resisted and raised hue and cry, then Babu S/o Puna Gameti R/o Parla-ka-Chaura (who was met and supervising the Draught Relief Operation), Pitha S/o Ratta Garasia, R/o Kotiya-ka-Leva and her brother Dhula came to the place of occurrence and tried to rescue her, but both the aforesaid accused were not inclined to set her free and she was forcibly taken to the village of Anda and was confined to the house of anda. Anda committed rape with her against her wishes and, thereafter, Anda burnt the heels of the prosecutrix by fire, so that she may not escape. Anda also gave her beating. In the night, while Anda was sleeping, she came running from the house of Anda to her village and narrated the entire story to her father. Lastly, it was averred in the complaint that case may be registered and action may be taken against Anda and Bhagga Garasia, in accordance with law.

(3). On the basis of the aforesaid complaint FIR (Ex.P-6) under Sections 366, 342, 324, 323 and 376 IPC, was registered at Police Station, Ogana, District - Udaipur, against the accused persons and the Investigation commenced.

(4). During the course of investigation, site was inspected and site inspection reports Ex.P-5 and Ex.P-6 were prepared, statements of the witnesses under Section 161, Cr.P.C.,were recorded, medical examination of Ku. Dhanni was conducted and injury report (Ex.P-4) was obtained, clothes of the victim Ku. Dhanni were seized and sealed vide Ex.P-7 and Ex.P-8, the accused were arrested, the report of the examination of the victim was obtained from the Medical Jurist of R.N.T. Medical College & General Hospital, Udaipur vide Ex.P-11, accused Anda was examined and his medical report (Ex.P-12) was obtained, M.L.C. of the victim was got done and report (Ex.P-13) was obtained and X-ray report of Kum. Dhanni (Ex.P-16) was also obtained.

(5). The challan against accused Anda under Sections 366, 376, 342, 323 and 324, IPC and against accused Bhagga under Sections 366 and 341 IPC, was filed in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhadol from where the case was committed to the Court of Sessions Judge and ultimately, the Sessions Judge transferred the case for decision to the Court of Additional Sessions Judge No.3, Udaipur.

(6). In support of its case, the prosecution examined as many as 18 witnesses (P.W.1 to P.W.18) and produced 19 documents (Ex.P-1 to Ex.P-19). In defence, the accused produced no defence. In the explanation under Section 313, Cr.P.C., the accused denied the charges and stated that they have been falsely implicated.

(7)
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top