Honble SHARMA, J.–In the instant appeal challenge is made to the judgment dated July 7, 2004 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast rack) No. 1 Alwar whereby the appellant was convicted and sentenced as under:-

u/S. 302 IPC:

To suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years.

u/S. 460 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

u/S. 333 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years and fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months.

u/S. 332 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years.

u/S. 353 IPC:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years.

u/S. 3/25 Arms Act:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs. 3,000/- in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

u/S. 4/25 Arms Act:

To suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. 500/- in default to further suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months.

The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

(2). It is the prosecution case that on October 17, 1989 a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document