HARBANS LAL
Jagdish Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
(2). The relevant facts are that of 27.3.2004 an F.I.R. came to be lodged at P.S. Shivdaspura by one Smt. Dhapu Devi W/o Bhanwar Lal Meena to the effect that petitioner Jagdish Prasad Sharma along with one Sanwar Ram and Sita Ram and 22-25 other persons came and forcibly took the possession of the land belonging to the complainant.
(3). After investigation, the charge-sheet was filed for offences under Sections 323, 447 IPC and Sec. 3(1)(5) of the Act of 1989 (hereinafter referred in short as ``the Act) against the petitioner and one Sanwar Ram.
(4). The trial Court after hearing the parties and upon perusal of the materials placed before it passed the impugned order directing faming of charges as indicated hereinabove.
(5). Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the offences under Sections 447 IPC and Sec. 3(1)(5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.