SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2257

N.N.MATHUR, R.P.VYAS
Priyanka (Miss) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.P. Sharma, for Appellants Vineet Mathur, Assistant Solicitor General

Honble MATHUR, J.–This appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 4.7.2006 dismissing the writ petition. In view of the urgency, on request of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard for final disposal at admission stage.

(2). The facts discernible from the pleadings and the documents which are not in dispute are that first appellant Miss Priyanka applied for admission to MBBS Degree Course at the Government College against the allotted seats in the category reserved for ex-defence disabled personnel under IVth Priority meant for disabled ex-servicemen, who are medically invalided/boarded out and drawing disability pension, being daughter of second appellant Satish Kumar. First appellant attached a certificate stating disability of her father ex J.W.O. Satish Kumar attributable to Air Force Services. The application was provisionally accepted. However, on a deeper scrutiny, it was detected that the disability of second appellant was not attributable to the Air Force Services and, therefore, his daughter was not entitled to get a medical seat in the Central Government viz; quota for wards of Defence personnels. Thus, the respondents in cas





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top