SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Raj) 2376

M.S.KHAN
Nihal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bastiram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Hagamilal Chaudhary, Advocate, for Petitioner;
Jagdish Prasad Mathur, Advocate, for Non-petitioner

[kku] lnLr&;g fuxjkuh vUrxZr /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e 1955 ds rgr Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh vyoj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 24-6-1999 ds fo:) bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¼2½ la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd izkFkhZax.k@oknhx.k us ,d okn gqDe bErukbZ nokeh mi[k.M vf/kdkjh fdkux<+ ftyk vyoj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k ftlds lkFk ,d izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 212 jk-dk-v- dk isk dj fuosnu fd;k fd vkjkth [k-ua- 792 feu okds chykgsMh rglhy fdkux<+okl esa gS ftlesa ls jdck 1 ch?kk oknh us jketl iq= rstjke ls tfj;s jftLVMZ c;ukek [kjhn dj fy;k ,oa ukekUrjdj.k la- 531 izkFkhZa fugkyflag ds uke ntZ gksdj Lohdkj gks pqdk gSA [kjhn ls vkjkth ij feu oknh ua 1 dkfct gSA mDr vkjkth esa feu fgLlk ?kfM;k o jkeflag dk Fkk ftuls oknh ua- 2 o 3 us tfj;s jftLVMZ c;ukek Ø; dj fy;k rFkk bUrdky ua- 528] 529 ntZ gksdj Lohdkj gks pqdk gSA oDr [kjhn ls oknhx.k dkfct dkr gS izfroknhx.k dk vkjkth;kr ls u rks lkjksdkj gS vkSj uk gh bl ij [kM+s ikuh iwyksa ls gh mudk ljksdkj gSA oknhx.k nwljs xkao o nwljs izkUr ds gS tkfr ls vuqlwfpr tkfr ds gS rFkk izfroknhx.k oknhx.k ds dCts dkr esa cstk vM+pu iSnk djrs gSA Mksyks ij [kM+s ikuh iwyksa dks dkVus esa ck/kk iSnk djrs gS ,oa fnukad 18-11-95





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top