Honble GUPTA, J.—This appeal has been filed against the judgment of learned Single Judge dated 1.10.1986, dismissing the appellants writ petition. By the writ petition, the appellant had challenged the order of the learned Board of Revenue dated 28.7.1986 Annexure-3, and dated 5.2.1979 being Annexure-2, to the writ petition.

(2)1 By the order Annexure-2, the Board of Revenue had dismissed the appellants two appeals, being Appeal Nos. 2 of 1977 and 3 of 1977, and vide Annexure-3, a review petition challenging the order passed in Appeal No. 2 of 1977, had been dismissed. Thus, the controversy is confined to the controversy raised in Appeal No. 2 of 1977 before the Board of Revenue.

(3). The Board of Revenue, while deciding the Appeal No. 2 of 1977, found, that the stand of the appellant (before the Board) about she being landless person, and entitled to priority in allotment; under Rule 17(3) of the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Rules, 1973, hereafter referred to as the Rules, cannot be accepted, as the appellant is a person who had transferred the land by selling or otherwise transferring it, therefore, what she is really asking is, for allotment of surplus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document