SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 670

M.S.KHAN
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
N.K. Goyal, Advocate, for Appellant;
Hangami Lal, Addl. Govt. Advocte

[kku] lnL; & ;g vihy jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh guqekux<+ ds fu.kZ; fnukad 2-8-02 ds fo:) jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 76 ds varxZr fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd ftyk dysDVj guqekux<+ ds U;k;ky; esa lksgu yky iq= nkukjke tkfr tkV fuoklh ryokM+k rglhy fVCch }kjk ,d izkFkZuk i= mifuosku vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 11 o 14 ds rgr izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd pd 1 Vh ,y MCY;w esa [kkrk la[;k 152 i-ua- 238@299 fd-ua- 22] 23 a- ua- 239@300 fd-ua- 3] 4] 6] 7 dqy 6 ch?kk d`f"k Hkwfe othj flag us vkoaVu vf/kdkjh ds le{k rF; fNikdj vkoaVu djk yh tcfd othj flag uke dks dksbZ vkneh dHkh Hkh xzke ryokM+k esa ugha jgk ,oa vfLrRo esa ugha gSA vkoaVu vf/kdkjhg ds le{k lgh rF; lkeus yk;s tkrs rks othj flag vkoaVu dk vf/kdkjh ugha gksrkA vr% Hkwfe jkT; ljdkj ds gd esa vfHkxzfgr dh tkosA ftyk dysDVj us ckn tkap mHk; i{k dks lqudj vius fu.kZ; fnukad 16-5-2001 dss }kjk othj flg ds i{k esa fd;s x;s vkoaVu dks csukeh ik;s tkus ds dkj.k fujLr dj fn;kA blls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZx.k us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh guqekux<+ ds U;k;ky; esa vihy nk;j dh ftUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 2-8-2002 ds }kjk vihy [kkfjt dj nhA blls O;fFkr gksdj f}rh; vihyg e.My ds le{k isk

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top