SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 672

M.S.KHAN
State of Raj. – Appellant
Versus
Chhogaram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Ramjan Mohmmad, Addl. Govt. Advocate, for Petitioner;
Madan Lal Gurjar, Advocate, for Non-petitioner

[kku] lnL; & ;g jsQjasl vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVjg MhMokuk }kjk vius vknsk fnukad 22-5-2000 ds }kjk jktLo e.My vtesj esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd rglhynkj ykMuw us v/khuLFk U;k;ky; essa izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd xzke ckysM+k d xr [kljk uEcj 8 ,oa 12 ftuds gky [kljk uEcj 16 jdck 20 ch?kk 8 fcLok] [kljk uEcj 22 jdck 18 fcLok] [kljk uEcj 23 jdck 46 ch?kk 10 fcLok [kljk uEcj 15 jdck 40 ch?kk 10 fcLok [kljk uEcj 24 jdck 37 ch?kk 1 fcLok Hkwfe laor~ 2006 esa Mksyh cuke~ eB Jh kadj th okds ckdfy;k c,reke NksVwiqjh psyk dkywiqfj dkSe Lokeh lkfdu ckdfy;k dh [kkrsnkjh esa ntZ FkhA orZeku esa ;g Hkwfe lsfVyesaV }kjk vizkFkhZx.k ds uke ntZ gSA eafnj ,d LFkkbZ ukckfyx gSA LFkkbZ ukckfyx dh lEifr dk eSustj vFkok iqtkjh VªLVh ds :i esa ek= ns[kHkky djus dk vf/kdkjh gksrk gSA Hkwfe gLrkUrj.k djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj mUgsa izkIr ugha gSA vr% mDr Hkwfe okil eafnj dh [kkrsnkjh esa ntZ dh tkosA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us i{kdkjku dks lqudj fooknxzLr vkjkth okil ewfrZ eafnj ds uke ntZ djus gsrq ;g jsQjsal e.My dks izsf"kr fd;k x;k gSA

3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA

4- izkFkhZ jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls mi jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd fooknxzLr












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top