SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 660

M.S.KHAN
Ramoli – Appellant
Versus
Parsadi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Kharagsingh, for Petitioner;
J.K. Pareek, for Non-petitioner

[kku] lnL; & ;g fuxjkuh varxZr /kkjk 84 lifBr /kkjk 9 jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ds rgr jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh Hkjriqj }kjk vihy la- 34@1994 esa ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; fnukad 27-9-2000 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZx.k us dysDVj ,oa Hkw izca/k vk;qDr iquokZl Hkjriqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 11-5-1994 ds fo:) vihy jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh Hkjriqj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh tks vHkh fopkjk/khu gSA nkSjkus vihy izkFkhZ us ,d izk- i= ckcr~ izkFkfed vkifRr izLrqr djus dk fuosnu fd;k fd vihy l{ke ugha gksus ls fujLr dh tkosaA jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh Hkjriqj us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 27-9-2000 ds }kjk izkFkhZ dk izk- i= ckcr~ izkFkfed vkifRr fujLr dj fn;kA bl fu.kZ; ds fo:) ;g fuxjkuh bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

3- geusa odqyk; Qjhdsu dh cgl fuxjkuh ij lquhA

4- fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd izkFkhZ us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh Hkjriqj ds le{k vizkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr vihy l{ke ugha Fkh ,oa esuVsuscy ugha Fkh blds ckotwn Hkh jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh us izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr izk- i= ckcr~ izkFkfed vkifRr fujLr djus esa dkuwuh Hkwy dh gSA jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh ds lkeus tks vihy izLrqr dh xbZ Fkh og bl dkj.k l{ke ugha Fkh fd izkFkhZ us dyDVj Hkjriqj ds ;gka /kkjk 122 Mh-ih- ,DV ds





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top