SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1818

A.K.PUROHIT
Avtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Didarsingh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Amritpal Singh, for Petitioner;
Bhup Singh Bishnoi, for Respondent

iqjksfgr] lnL;—;g fuxjkuh /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e*½ ds varxZr rglhynkj ¼Hkw-vfHkys[k½] ?kMlkuk ds vknsk fnukad 19-12-2005 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gSa fd ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 39 j?kqohjflag oYn m?keflag ds [kkrsnkjh dh vkjkth pd uacj 4 ,-,u-Mh-ch- rglhy ?kM+lkuk ftyk Jhxaxkuxj ds laca/k esa gYdk iVokjh }kjk nhnkjflag vizkFkhZ uacj 1 ds gd esa ukekUrjdj.k xksnukesa ds vk/kkj ij [kkrsnkj j?kqohjflag dk LoxZokl gksus ds ckn Hkj dj rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk ds le{k izLrqr fd;kA bl ij rglhynkj] ?kM+lkuk us fnukad 23-7-1999 dks ;g vknsk ikfjr fd;k fd xksnukesa dk ukekUrjdj.k dh lquokbZ ds ipkr~ fu.kZ; fd;k tkuk gSA vr% ckn lquokbZ fu.kZ;kuqlkj vadu fd;k tkuk gS blfy;s ;g ukekUrjdj.k vLohdkj gSA orZeku izkFkhZ vorkjflag us ,d fu;fer jktLo okn fnukad 10-10-2005 dks miftyk/khk] ?kM+lkuk ds U;k;ky; esa *vf/kfu;e^ dh /kkjk 88] 188 ,oa 153 ds rgr orZeku vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) izLrqr fd;k ftlesa dFku fd;k x;k fd j?kqohjflag] foØeflag] vrjflag] vthrflag pkj HkkbZ Fks ftuesa ls vrjflag ds vykok vU; foØeflag yk-vkSykn rFkk j?kqohjflag vkSj vthrflag vfookfgr gksus ds dkj.k vrjflag ds iq=@iqf=;ka gh fgUnw fof/k ds vuqlkj tk;t okfjlku gS
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top