Honble BHANDARI, J.–Leave granted.

(2). Judges must administer law according to the provisions of law. It is the bounden duty of judges to discern legislative intention in the process of adjudication. Justice administered according to individuals whim, desire, inclination and notion of justice would lead to confusion, disorder and chaos.

(3). Indiscriminate and frequent interference, under Section 100 CPC in cases which are totally devoid of any substantial question of law is not only against the legislative intention but is also the main cause of huge pendency of second appeals in the High Courts leading to colossal delay in the administration of justice in civil cases in our country.

(4). Despite declaration of law in numerous judgments, it is evident that the scope and ambit of Section 100 CPC has not been properly appreciated and applied in a large number of cases. We are, once again making a serious endeavour to discern legislative intention, ambit and scope of interference under Section 100 CPC. We plan to carry out this exercise by critically examining important judgments decided before and after 1976 amendment in Section 100 CPC. This effort is made with the hope that in futur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document