SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, VINEET KOTHARI
Vimla Bai – Appellant
Versus
Panchu Lal – Respondent
(2). Contextual facts depict that the respondent husband in the petition under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act averred that his marriage with the appellant took place some 16 years back. After the marriage the respondent husband and his mother started residing in the house of appellant wife and start cultivating the agricultural land of appellants father. Since the respondent was poor, the appellant wife used to tease and torture him. The appellant wife was a lady of easy virtue therefore she got herself subjected to vasectomy operation. The appellant wife was arrested in a criminal case under sections 302, 201 and 120B IPC and thus caused mental cruelty to the respondent husband. She deserted him for the last ten years. Thus he was entitled to de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.