R.V.RAVEENDRAN, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Usha Balashaheb Swami – Appellant
Versus
Kiran Appaso Swami – Respondent
(2). This appeal is directed against the order dated 3rd October 2005 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No 2390 of 2005 whereby the order passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kolhapur in Special Civil Suit No. 503 of 1996 was set aside.
(3). The plaintiff, who is the respondent no. 1 in the present appeal, (hereinafter called the "plaintiff") has instituted a suit for partition and separate possession of the suit properties as fully described in Para 1 of the plaint on the allegations stated in brief as follows :-
The suit properties originally belonged to one Veersangayya (since deceased). On his death, Appasao (since deceased) and Balasao (since deceased) came to inherit the suit properties. The appellants who are defendants 8 to 14 in the suit are the heirs and legal representatives of Balasao (since deceased). The Plaintiff inherited one half share of the suit properties jointly with defendant nos. 1 to 7, on the death of Appasao. Since the appellants had refused to partition the suit properties and deliver separate possession, the plaintiff filed the suit for partition and possession.
(4). The defendant nos. 1 to
L.J. Leach and Co. Ltd. vs. Jardine Skinner and Co. [AIR 1957 SC 357] 21
Modi Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. vs. Ladha Ram & Co. [1976(4) SCC 320] 10
Heera Lal vs. Kalyan Mal & Ors. [1998 (1) SCC 278] 10
Baldev Singh & Ors. vs. Manohar Singh [2006 [6] SCC 498] 12
B.K. Narayana Pillai vs. Parameswaran Pillai (2000(1) SCC 712) 20
Baldev Singh & Ors. vs. Manohar Singh (2006 (6) SCC 498) 20
Akshaya Restaurant vs. P. Anjanappa [1995 [Supp] (2) SCC 303] 28
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.