SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 427

N.K.JAIN
Mangi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajesh Goswami, Counsel for accused- Appellant Nirmala Sharma, PP for State

Honble JAIN, J.–Accused-appellant Mangilal S/o Radhakishan has preferred this appeal challenging the order of his conviction, dated 9th of June, 2003, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Bundi, in Sessions Case No.85/2001, whereby he has been convicted and sentenced under Section 376 I.P.C. to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand); in default of payment of fine, to further undergo one months additional simple imprisonment.

(2). Briefly stated the facts of the case are that a written- report, Exhibit P-11, was lodged by PW-6 Kalu Lal, the husband of prosecutrix Madi Bai (PW-8) at Police Station Kotwali - Bundi, alleging therein that on 22.12.1995, accused Mangilal committed forcible sexual intercourse with his wife. The police registered FIR No.317/1995 (Exhibit P-12) under Section 376, IPC, and started investigation.

(3). After completion of investigation, a chargesheet was filed against the accused. The trial court framed charge against the accused for the offence under Section 376, IPC, which was denied by him and the trial was claimed.

(4). The prosecution and the defence, both, produced oral as well as documentary evide




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top