N.K.JAIN
Mangi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). Briefly stated the facts of the case are that a written- report, Exhibit P-11, was lodged by PW-6 Kalu Lal, the husband of prosecutrix Madi Bai (PW-8) at Police Station Kotwali - Bundi, alleging therein that on 22.12.1995, accused Mangilal committed forcible sexual intercourse with his wife. The police registered FIR No.317/1995 (Exhibit P-12) under Section 376, IPC, and started investigation.
(3). After completion of investigation, a chargesheet was filed against the accused. The trial court framed charge against the accused for the offence under Section 376, IPC, which was denied by him and the trial was claimed.
(4). The prosecution and the defence, both, produced oral as well as documentary evide
Dilip and Another vs. State of M.P. (2001) 9 SCC 452)–Followed. 16
Joseph vs. State of Kerala (2000) 5 SCC 197) 17
Sri Narayan Saha and Another vs. State of Tripur a (2004) 7 SCC 775)–Followed. 18
State of H.P. vs. Asha Ram (2005) 13 SCC 766) 19
Ranjit Hazarika vs. State of Assam (1998) 8 SCC 635 : 1998 SCC (Cri) 1725) 19
Om Prakas h vs. State of U.P. (2006) 9 SCC 787 = (2006(3) RLW 2555 (SC) 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.