SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 931

RAJESH BALIA
Harisita Hotels (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
M.S. Singhvi, for Appellant;
L.R. Upadhyaya, for Respondents

Honble BALIA, J.—The facts which are not in dispute are that vide communication dtd. 19.6.1969, the Collector, Jalore was conveyed sanction under Section 102 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1956) for allotment of 5000 square yards of land for industrial purposes in Khasra No.2386 in Bhinmal town to Sh. Harinarayan Agarwal predecessor in title of present petitioner subject to usual conditions against the transfer and subletting of the land in question. The allotment was made on the prevailing market price of the land to be ascertained by the Collector and on payment of full price, the possession of the land was to be delivered to the allottee. In furtherance of the aforesaid sanction, the Collector, Jalore passed an order on11.8.1969 by which said Sh. Harinarayan Agarwal was allotted 5000 sq. yards of land for industrial purpose in Bhinmal town. The price was determined at 0.50 paisa per square yard. On payment of full price, possession of land was to be delivered. In furtherance of order dtd. 18.8.1969, in pursuance of the directions issued by the Collector vide communication dtd. 13.8.1969, the applicant deposited Rs.2500/- vide chall







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top