R.N.ARVIND
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jamalddin – Respondent
2. Briefly the facts of this case are that the land situated in village Ridmalsar of khasra No. 40/19/7 area 29 bighas 14 biswas was recorded in the names of Peera and Chhotya and after the death of Peera the share of Peera was also mutated in the name of Chhotya alias Chhotu Khan through mutation No. 79. Chhotya alias Chhotu Khan sold this land during his lifetime through a registered sale deed dated 17.3.75 to the petitioner and handed over the possession at the same time. As per the registered sale deed dated 17.3.75 mutation No. 177 was recorded in the name of the petitioner and the petitioner subsequently became khatedar of the disputed land. During the lifetime of Chhotu Khan neither daughters of Chhotu Khan nor daughters of Peera made any claim on the disputed land. The non-petitioners from the very beginning had the knowledge of the registered sale-deed dated 17.3.75 but hiding this fact they entered into a conspiracy and made an appeal against the mutation No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.