SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 2004

R.N.ARVIND
Shanti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Jamalddin – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
K.K. Purohit, Counsel, for Petitioner;
N.K. Goyal, Counsel, for Non-petitioners No.2 to 4

Honble Arvind, M.—This is a revision petition under Section 84 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 against the order dated 4.5.2006 passed by learned Additional Divisional Commissioner, Bikaner in case No. 11/2004.

2. Briefly the facts of this case are that the land situated in village Ridmalsar of khasra No. 40/19/7 area 29 bighas 14 biswas was recorded in the names of Peera and Chhotya and after the death of Peera the share of Peera was also mutated in the name of Chhotya alias Chhotu Khan through mutation No. 79. Chhotya alias Chhotu Khan sold this land during his lifetime through a registered sale deed dated 17.3.75 to the petitioner and handed over the possession at the same time. As per the registered sale deed dated 17.3.75 mutation No. 177 was recorded in the name of the petitioner and the petitioner subsequently became khatedar of the disputed land. During the lifetime of Chhotu Khan neither daughters of Chhotu Khan nor daughters of Peera made any claim on the disputed land. The non-petitioners from the very beginning had the knowledge of the registered sale-deed dated 17.3.75 but hiding this fact they entered into a conspiracy and made an appeal against the mutation No















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top