SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 124

KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
Rampyari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
C.P. Sharma, for Petitioner

Jheky] lnL;-&fuxjkuh la[;k 99@2002 ^^eq- jkeI;kjh cuke txnhk** esa ,dyihB }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 13-8-2002 ds fo:) jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 299 ds vUrxZr izkFkhZ txnhk }kjk izuxr utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= fnukad 23-4-2004 dks isk fd;k x;k gSA utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk izkFkhZ us ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 dk izkFkZuk i= Hkh izLrqr fd;kA

2- izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd izkFkhZ@oknh txnhk }kjk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] uksgj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr okn fnukad 29-8-2000 dks vne gktjh o vne iSjoh esa [kkfjt dj fn;k x;k ftlds fo:) izkFkhZ us vknsk 9 fu;e 9 lifBr /kkjk 151 lh-ih-lh- ds vUrxZr izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj okn dks jsLVksj djus dk fuosnu fd;kA bl izkFkZuk i= dks mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us vius vknsk fnukad 29-6-2002 }kjk Lohdkj fd;k ftlds fo:) fuxjkuh la- 99@2002 vizkFkhZ eq- jkeI;kjh o vU; 6 }kjk izLrqr dh xbZ] tks fu.kZ; fnukad 13-8-2004 }kjk Lohdkj dj yh xbZA jktLo e.My dk;kZy; dh fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= ifjlhek vof/k ds ckgj izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ us foyEc dks {kE; fd, tkus ds fy, vkosnu i= izLrqr fd;k vkSj mlds leFkZu esa kiFk i= Hkh izLrqr fd;kA vizkFkhZ jkeI;kjh o vU; 6 dh vksj ls Jh czãkuUn



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top