SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 1131

DINESH MAHESHWARI
Shyam Bihari Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Rent Tribunal, Udaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Siddharth Joshi, for Petitioner; Om Mehta, for Respondent No.2;

Honble MAHESHWARI, J.–The writ petitioner is defending a petition for eviction (Case No.57/2003) filed by his landlord and pending before the Rent Tribunal, Udaipur. Though a copy of the eviction petition has been filed with this writ petition as Annexure-1, but copy of the reply submitted by the petitioner has not been annexed; however, the fact that the present petitioner is a tenant in the premises in question seems not to be in dispute.

(2). It appears from the material placed on record in this writ petition and cognate Writ Petition No.7369/2006 relating to the same eviction petition and being decided by a separate order today, that the issues in the matter have been framed on the questions of reasonable and bona fide requirement, material alteration and acquiring of suitable alternative accommodation by the tenant; and this Court by the order dated 17.08.2006 passed in an earlier writ petition has expected the Tribunal to decide the matter within two months thereof.

(3). While the matter was being proceeded in cross- examination of the witnesses, the petitioner-tenant moved an application in the said eviction petition purported to be under Section 21(3) of the Rajasthan Rent Co






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top