SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 1035

DINESH MAHESHWARI
Anop Chand – Appellant
Versus
Nand Kishore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C. Samdariya, for Petitioner;

Honble MAHESHWARI, J.–The writ petitioner is defending a petition filed by his landlords before the Rent Tribunal, Nagaur (Case No.12/2006) for recovery of arrears of rent, for revision of rent, and for eviction on the grounds, inter alia, of default in payment of rent, reasonable and bona fide requirement of the landlord, and the tenant acquiring suitable accommodation. After filing of the reply by the present petitioner, the respondents- landlords filed their rejoinder and along with the rejoinder put in certain documents Exhibit 16 to 18 and so also affidavits of the applicant Kamal Kishore and one witness Naresh. The petitioner raised objection that such additional affidavits and documents were filed with the rejoinder without there being any permission or direction from the Tribunal in that regard; and that Section 15(4) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (the Act) provides only for filing of rejoinder but there is no provision that permits filing of affidavits and documents with rejoinder.

(2). The objection so raised by the petitioner has been rejected by the Tribunal by the impugned order dated 20.07.2007(Annex.7) with the following observations:-

^^cskd fdjk;k dkuwu esa































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top