Honble MAJMUDAR, J.–By filing this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the respondents may be directed to consider the case of the petitioner in the category of divorced women on the basis of `talaknama executed by her husband and on that basis, the application form submitted by the petitioner for being appointed on the post of Teacher Grade-III in Primary Education may be taken into consideration on merit in the category of divorced women.

(2). For the purpose of recruitment to the post of Teacher Grade-III an advertisement was issued by the respondents. As per the said advertisement, which is at Annex.-1 (page 10), 645 posts were reserved for the category of divorced women. As per the clause in the aforesaid advertisement, a lady who is applying for the said post in the category of divorced women is to furnish a decree of divorce granted by the competent Court for her claim to be considered for appointment in the category of divorced women. It is the aforesaid clause in the advertisement which is attacked by the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner being a muslim woman is subject to Muslim Personal Law and having been given talak by her husband as per the Shariat law, she is not required to go to the Court of law by filing petition for the purpose of declaration that a valid divorce is given to her by her husband.

(3). Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the Muslim law the husband can give divorce to his wife by way of `talak as envisaged under the Shariat law and, therefore, the proof of such talaknama should be treated as a conclusive proof and for Muslim woman it is not necessary to produce decree of divorce and the insistence of the department that even Muslim woman should also produce decree of divorce, is arbitrary and uncalled for. It is submitted that the clause in the advertisement, therefore, should not be made applicable to Muslim divorced woman. It is submitted that accordingly, in the instant case, the petitioner is subjected to talaknama dated 21.5.2004 executed by her husband. The said talaknama bears signatures of two witnesses. On the aforesaid premises, it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the insistence of the department to produce decree of divorce is not at all justified.

(4). Learned counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Mst. Shamim Akhtar, delivered in S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 718/1997 dated 27.11.1997 = (RLW 1998(1) Raj. 111), wherein the learned Single Judge of this Court has held that when a muslim lady submitted an affidavit that she got talak orally and fails to produce decree for divorce, her case cannot be taken out of consideration for the purpose of appointment in the category of divorced women.

(5). Learned counsel Mr. Agrawal, on the other hand, submitted that there is a possibility that there may not be a genuine talak, but only in order to secure appointment, such talaknama may be created, therefore, in order to see that there is a genuine talak, it is necessary that a decree of divorce of a competent court should be produced.

(6). On behalf of the respondents, reply affidavit has also been filed by respondents No. 1 to 3. In para 3 of the reply, it is averred that the copy of decree of divorce was required to be produced according to the directions of the State Level Committee. In para 4 of the reply, it is stated that the contents of para 4 of the writ petition are not disputed regarding the document of talaknama, produced by the petitioner alongwith her writ petition. In para 5 of the reply, it is stated that the said talaknama is not disputed but the petitioner was required to submit decree of divorce.

(7). I have heard both the learned Advocates and have gone through the writ petition and the reply affidavit.

(8). The principle question which requires consideration is whether in case of a Muslim lady, the insistence that she must p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document