SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 547

R.S.CHAUHAN
Ram Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kamlendra Sihag, for Appellant; Arun Sharma, P.P., for State;

Honble CHAUHAN, J.–The appellant has challenged the judgment/order dated 27.03.1986 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jaipur District, Jaipur, whereby the appellant has been convicted for offence under Section 307 and 323 of Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC"). For offence under Section 307 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.100/- and he was directed to further undergo one months rigorous imprisonment in default of payment of fine. For offence under Section 323 IPC, he has been sentenced to three months of rigorous imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.100/- and he was further directed to undergo one month of rigorous imprisonment in default of payment of fine. It has also been directed that both the sentences should run concurrently.

(2). In brief, the facts of the case are that one Mr. Ramphool (P.W.7) had lodged a written report (Ex.P.4) at Police Station, Jamwa Ramgarh (District Jaipur), wherein he claimed that, "Ram Karan is his brother. Fields of Ram Karan and Ram Pal are next to each other. Today he went to Toda and had returned back to his village about 2:30 PM. When he came to his village, he discovered that his bro








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top