Honble RAFIQ, J.–Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case inasmuch as the petitioner was not driving the vehicle at the time of incident and no specific injury has been inflicted by the petitioner. Learned Court below erred in law in rejecting the bail application solely on the ground of previous cases registered against the petitioner.

(2). This bail application u/S. 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed at the instance of an accused who is yet again asking for the grant of bail pending trial even though as per the order passed by the Court of Sessions, Alwar, he was in the past extended such liberty in as many as 17 cases. He has thus been repeatedly misusing the liberty granted by different courts. The first case registered against the petitioner with Police Station Hindaun was under Section 379 and 411 IPC. Thereafter, another case was registered against the petitioner in the year 2005 again under Section 379 and then in the year 2006 again FIR for offence under Section 379 and 411 was lodged against the petitioner with Police Station Kulav vs. the year 2007, six different cases were registered against the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document