SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 803

(Supreme Court)
Honble Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Honble P. SATHASIVAM, J.
State of Rajasthan - Appellant
Versus
Gulab Singh & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. of 2008
Decided On : July 10, 2008

Advocates Appeared:
Not Available

Headnote:Cr.P.C., 1973, Sec. 374 and 386 and Penal Code, Sec. 302 read with Sec. 34 – Appeal against conviction – High Court altered the conviction of respondent for offence punishable u/Sec. 302 read with Sec. 34 Penal Code to Sec. 307 Penal Code – Ground of altering the conviction was that there was no injury on the person of the deceased – Learned Public Prosecutor accepted the allegation – Evidence of the doctor to which reference has been made by trial Court clearly shows that there were 12 injuries on the body of the deceased – In the post-mortem report also 12 injuries were indicated – Held – High Court was in error in altering the conviction from Sec. 302 read with Sec. 34 to Sec. 307 IPC – Judgment of trial Court restored. Appeal allowed.(Paras 10, 11, 14 & 15)

        na-iz-la-] 1973] /kkjk 374 ,oa 386 vkSj n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 302 lifBr /kkjk 34 & nks"kflf) ds fo:) vihy &mPp U;k;ky; us izR;FkhZ dh /kkjk 302 lifBr /kkjk 34 ds rgr n.Muh; vijk/k gsrq nks"kflf) dks Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 307 esa rCnhy dh & nks"kflf) rCnhy djus dk dkj.k ;g Fkk fd e`rd ds kjhj ij dksbZ ?kko ugha Fkk & fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vfHkdFku Lohdkj fd;k & fpfdRld dk lk{; ftldk fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk lanHkZ fn;k x;k gS og Li"V :i ls ;g nkkZrk gS fd e`rd ds kjhj ij pksVksa ds 12 fukku Fks & ko ijh{k.k fjiksVZ esa Hkh 12 pksVs nkkZ;h xbZ & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & /kkjk 302 lifBr /kkjk 34 ls nks"k flf) dks Hkk-na-la- dh /kkjk 307 esa rCnhy djus esa mPp U;k;ky; us =qfV dh & fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; cgky fd;kA ¼in l[a;k 10, 11, 14 o 15) vihy Lohdkj dhA

Honble PASAYAT, J.–Leave granted.

(2). Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, altering the conviction of the respondent for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC) to Section 307 IPC. However, the conviction under Sections 458 and 460 IPC were maintained. The substantive sentences in respect of the offences were reduced to the period already undergone.

(3). The trial Court i.e. learned Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Rajsamand had convicted respondents 1 to 4 for offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 and Sections 460, 458 and 397 of IPC and various other sentences in respect of the other offences.

(4). Prosecution version in a nutshell is as follows: Sessions case in question arose from the first information report (exhibit P-5) which was presented by the complainant Shri Prakash Chand (PW-4) before the police incharge of Arakshi Kendra, Rajsamand on 11.7.1999. It was stated therein that on 11.7.1999 in the morning at around 6.30 a commotion was taking place outside the house of Dali Chand father of Naval Ram. The complainant went to the house of Dali Chand and saw that Smt. Jyoti wife of Dali Chand was lying dead there, whereas her hands and mouth/face were tied with cloth. Inside the room the hands and legs of Dali Chand were also found tied. Thereafter, Roop Singh untied his hands and legs. Goods were lying scattered inside the room. The children of Dali Chand live in Bombay and Dali Chand was having a shop of controlled commodities. This incident was stated to have been committed by some unknown persons.

After the presentation of the aforesaid complaint, case No.479/99 for offences punishable under Sections 460/458 IPC was registered and investigation commenced. In the course of the investigation the investigating officer recorded the statement of the complainant Prakash Chand. The injured Dali Chand was admitted in the hospital at Rajsamand and Udaipur for treatment. His injury report Exh.P-4 was received. His x-ray was also conducted. After inspection of the place of the incident, spot memo exh.P-14 was prepared. The panchayatnama memo of the dead body of the deceased Jyotibai Exh.P-1 was prepared. The clothes which had been used to tie the hands and the mouth of the deceased were having blood on them and, therefore, they were seized as evidence vide exh. P-7. After conducting the post mortem of the dead body of the deceased the report Exh.P-3 was taken on record. Her dead body was handed over to her heirs for cremation vide Exh.P-2. From the place of the incident bloodstained stones and control sample stones were seized in respect whereof exh.P-8 was prepared. Statements of the witnesses were recorded. A list of stolen articles was prepared. Chance prints were taken from the place of the incident. Accused Gulab Singh, Uday Singh, Nathu Singh and Laxman Singh were arrested. Gold and silver articles along with cash of Rs.24,400/- were recovered at their instance. Thereafter, jewellery was recovered at the instance of accused Dhool Singh and Shambu Singh. In this regard exhs. P-10 to Exh.P-13 were prepared. The place of the incident was pointed out by the accused in respect whereof exhs. P-49 to 52 was prepared. The accused were identified by the witness-Dali Chand and thereafter the seized case property in the case were also identified in respect whereof exh. P-67 to 72 were prepared. Bloodstained clothes and stones were sent for FSL examination to Forensic Sciences Laboratory Udaipur. The place of the incident was photographed. After necessary investigation sufficient evidence was found against accused Gulab Singh, Uday Singh, Nathu Singh for offences punishable under Sections 460, 458, 302 IPC and against accused Dhool Singh, Moti Singh, Shambu Singh for offences under Sections 414, 411, 120B IPC. The station in charge, Raj Nagar filed a charge sheet against the above name









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top