SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 1101

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Deena – Appellant
Versus
B. O. R. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
R.K. Goyal, for Petitioners
Gyaneshwar Bardar with Mohan Palsaria, for Respondents

Honble RAFIQ, J.—This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners against the judgment of the Board of Revenue (for short - the Board) dated 20.10.1998 whereby the appeal filed by respondent No. 4 against the judgment of the Revenue Appellate Authority (for short - the Authority) dated 6.5.1994 was allowed and the judgment/decree passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Jaipur dated 6.5.1994 was set aside and the judgment passed by learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Kotputli dated 23.1.1991 was restored.

2. Originally a revenue suit under Section 88 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, (for short the Act) was filed by the respondent No.4, Gyarsa before the Sub-Divisional Officer. Dispute between the parties is about the land measuring 25 bighas and 18 biswas of khasra No. 115 situated in village Pragpura. The plaintiff contended that petitioners have trespassed over 12.10 bighas of land out of the aforesaid land situated towards north-east. The petitioners later got their name recorded in the girdawari and also managed to get a parcha issued in their favour during settlement operations. The plaintiff therefore prayed that possession of khasra No. 115 be directed to be handed over to him













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top