SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Raj) 1499

R.B.PARMAR
Kishori Lal – Appellant
Versus
Seema Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Poonam Mathur, for Petitioner;
Ajeet Lodha, for Respondents

ijekj] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh vUrxZr /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds rgr jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] vyoj }kjk ikfjr fd;s x;s vknsk fnukad 8-5-2007 ds fo:) bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

2- la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZ la- 1 yxk;r 9 }kjk ,d jktLo okn fo:) izkFkhZ ,oa rjrhch vizkFkhZx.k ds U;k;ky; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] vyoj esa vUrxZr /kkjk 88] 89] 188 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds rgr xzke MwesM+k rglhy] vyoj esa fLFkfr okni= esa of.kZr oknxzLr vkjkth;kr ckcr~ izLrqr fd;k x;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us oknhx.k@vizkFkhZ la- 1 yxk;r 9 }kjk izLrqr okn dks jsl T;wfMdsVk dh Js.kh esa ekurs gq, okn oknhx.k vius fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 4-9-2006 ds }kjk [kkfjt dj fn;kA bl fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh ds fo:) jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] vyoj ds U;k;ky; esa vihy izLrqr dh xbZA nkSjkus vihy jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh }kjk fnukad 8-5-2007 dks iwoZ esa fn;s x;s LFkxu vknsk dh vof/k c<+kbZ xbZ gS ftlds fo:) ;g fuxjkuh bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

3- geus nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl fuxjkuh ij lquhA

4- fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd izkFkhZ us fuxjkuh esa vafdr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, vius i{k ds leFkZu esa cgl djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dk vknsk U;k;] fu;e ,oa fjdkMZ ds fo:) gksus ls fujLruh; gSA vi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top