SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 315

DINESH MAHESHWARI
Deva Ram – Appellant
Versus
A. D. J. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
K.K. Maharshi, for Petitioners

Honble MAHESHWARI, J.—By way of this writ petition the petitioners-applicants seek to question the order dated 14.12.2007 passed by the Additional District Judge, Deedwana in Civil Suit No.10/2001 whereby, inter alia, their application for impleadment in the suit for specific performance has been declined.

2. Briefly put, the facts and aspects relevant for the present purpose as emerging from the material placed on record are that the suit in question has been filed on 01.09.1993 by the plaintiff Omprakash (respondent No. 2 herein) against the defendants Motaram (respondent No. 3 herein) and his sons Ramdhan (since deceased and represented by his legal representatives respondents Nos. 4/1 to 4/10 herein) and Pemaram (respondent No. 5 herein). The plaintiff Omprakash has alleged the defendants Motaram, Ramdhan and Pemaram having entered into an agreement on 02.09.1990 to sell 100 bighas of southern portion of their agricultural land comprised in Khasra No. 48 at Village Audit, Tehsil Ladnu to him for a consideration of Rs. 1,00,000/-, having received an amount of Rs. 50,000/-, having agreed to receive the remaining amount at the time of registration of sale document, and having execu





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top